Institutional Metric Registry

The Fragility Index

Quantifying the industrial risk of high-value assets. Our 1-10 Fragility Score measures paper stock porosity, surface sensitivity, and edge-integrity variables.

Asset Set / Card Fragility Score Institutional Reasoning
1952 Topps Baseball
High Numbers (#312-407)
9.8
Thin, porous paper stock + extreme registration shift sensitivity.
1993 Upper Deck SP
Derek Jeter Foil #279
9.9
Holographic foil surface prone to instant hairline scratches on contact.
1986 Fleer Basketball
All Cards
9.5
Solid red/blue color borders reveal every micron of edge wear.
1999 Pokemon 1st Edition
Holographic Rare Charizard
9.4
Massive surface area for scratches + edge silvering tendency.
2000 Playoff Contenders
Tom Brady #144
9.2
Matte surface stock prone to corner "fuzzing" with zero handling.
1979 O-Pee-Chee Hockey
Wayne Gretzky #18
9.7
Wire-cut factory edges create infinite grading subjectivity.
2024 Panini Prizm
Silver Prizm Parallels
8.2
High production volume surface pitting + print line saturation.
2012 Panini National Treasures
RPA (Patch Autos)
9.6
Thick card stock (130pt+) prone to severe corner chipping.
1996 Topps Chrome
Refractor Parallel
9.1
Green 'hulking' surface fading + refractor line artifacts.
2003 Exquisite Collection
RPA Logoman
9.9
Compound risk: Thick stock + surface gloss + autograph streaking.

Underlying Hardware Logic

Fragility scores higher than 9.0 indicate an "Existential Grading Risk." For these assets, the act of removal from a factory pack can instantly degrade the corner sub-grade. We recommend institutional-level staging and cleaning protocols for any asset above 8.5.

View Handling Protocols