Corners, edges, surface & centering — powered by computer vision.
Close-up viewSelect any corner or edge on the card to inspect it here, then tap the close-up to zoom in. Tap the middle of the card to see your original photo.
Cantos
8
Near Mint
Bordas
8
Near Mint
Superfície
8
Near Mint
Centralização
6.5
Muito bom
Left/Right 69/31Top/Bottom 50/50
📷
Photo quality limited this grade
Centering capped at 8 — photo quality 35/100
A grade is only as high as the photo can prove. Retake in sharp focus, out of the sleeve, with even light and no glare — the card may grade higher.
Centralização is the weakest sub-grade at 6.5. PSA is strict; BGS/CGC moderate. Next concern: Superfície 8.0
PreGradeCards
AI-Powered Card Grading Analysis Report
11/11/2026
pregradecards.com
Surface inspection
Surface Lab
Five ways to see why the surface scored what it did — magnify the marks, trace the scratches, rake light across the surface. Open any tool to inspect the card yourself.
Centering Details
6.5
Saved Centering Score
6.5 / 10
Fair centering
Centering overlay: green/red guides mark the measured printed borders; labels are the saved measurements.
Border Measurements
Saved L/R Ratio69/31
Saved T/B Ratio50/50
Left11px
Top7px
Right5px
Bottom7px
The card is shifted right horizontally and centered vertically relative to the image frame.
Border widths as a fraction of the card's full dimension (0.05 = 5%). Lower = tighter.
Analysis Images
Original Image
Cropped Card
Sobreposição de centralização
PGC Slab
📸
Image Quality Analysis
Poor — 35/100
Framing: too farLighting: uneven
Photo issues
multiple_cards
card_in_stack
too_far
card_near_frame_edge
uneven lighting — part of the card sits in shadow
uneven lighting — one side of the card is much brighter than the other
Please submit only one card per photo rather than multiple cards or stacked decks, as placing cards in stacks prevents our system from isolating the edges, corners, and borders of an individual card. Move in closer to let the single card fill more of the photo on a plain, contrasting surface, and leave a margin of clear background on all sides so the right edge does not risk being cropped. In addition, the lighting is uneven across the card—softer, more balanced light will help prevent shadows that can obscure true surface texture and border details.
Hybrid Grade Forecast™
Based on our AI sub-grade analysis, here is how we expect this card to perform across major grading companies.
Your photo quality directly affects the AI's ability to read your card accurately. Here are the most common things that can affect your grade — and how to fix them:
🖼️
Use a plain background
Patterned or colorful backgrounds make it harder for the AI to detect your card's true edges. Place your card on a solid white or light-colored surface before photographing.
🃏
Scan raw cards — no sleeves or toploaders
Penny sleeves and toploaders reflect light and blur fine details. The AI can't accurately assess corners, edges, or surface through plastic. Remove all holders before scanning.
🔍
Fill the frame — get close
The more of the image your card occupies, the more detail the AI can see. Small or distant cards lose corner sharpness and surface detail. Crop in so the card fills most of the photo.
💡
Use even, shadow-free lighting
Shadows, glare, and camera flash create artifacts that look like surface defects to the AI. Use soft, diffused lighting from multiple angles — or scan on a flatbed scanner for the most consistent results.
📐
Keep the card flat and straight
A tilted or bent card distorts centering measurements and can create false edge wear readings. Place the card flat on a solid surface and shoot directly from above.
✅ Fix these issues and rescan — you'll often see better grade on the second attempt. Every credit saves you from wasting a $25–$80 grading submission fee.
Disclaimer: PreGradeCards reports, AI pre-grade estimates, sub-grades, and market values are provided for entertainment, estimation, and evaluation purposes only. Card identification, market comps, pricing, and population data are sourced from or supplemented by third parties. We make no guarantees, promises, or warranties—implied or expressed—as to grade accuracy in comparison to any other grading organization or regarding any other information in this report. Users should independently corroborate all information with additional sources before making any decisions or taking any actions.